In Lutz Bassmann’s Danse avec Nathan Golshem, Nathan Golshem reflects with some regret
on his choice—made in the instant, under torture—to pretend to be an itinerant
storyteller and litterateur, one Gurbal Bratichko. Under the beatings [which are not narrated],
Bratichko proved himself an inexhaustible font of useless stories [but these aren't narrated, either; we learn about them, but we don't read them]. These stories are pure
inventions, without any interpretive path back to the
actions of Golshem and his comrades. Talking and talking, Bratichko achieved Ingrid Vogel’s wish, in Lisbonne,
derniere marge, to write a literature indecipherable by the police.
Bratichko speaks to his torturers, volubly, but he is a man without secrets, “a
poet, that is to say, less than nothing.”
But this is Golshem's regretful reflection:
But this is Golshem's regretful reflection:
“…il avait toujours été tourné vers l’action… la
palabre littéraire, quand il n’avait pas de relation directe avec la
propagande, lui avait toujours paru méprisable.”
No comments:
Post a Comment